On Saturday I taught a ground skills seminar to the United
States Police Canine Association (Region 12)
The class went very well and the feedback was
fantastic. Some interesting points were
brought up so I thought I would share some of them with the good folks that
read this blog.
When I was first approached about this the organizer told me
that the USPCA is putting on a weekend training seminar for its members at Camp Ripley . He said the training will consist of some
long and intense tracks with their dogs on Friday. Saturday they handlers will be tired and
their dogs will need to rest. He asked
me if on Saturday I could provide some training above and beyond what they
receive in their basic defensive tactics class, as an incentive for more K9
handlers to attend the training seminar.
He also said that he spoke to several of the handlers and they requested
some type of Jui Jitsu training. He
implied that the interest in Jui Jitsu was to deal with mixed martial artists.
I was happy to accept the opportunity / challenge
As I prepared the lesson plan the first goal I set out to achieve
was to change a mind set.
A particular pet peeve of mine is the (insert sport here)
for Law Enforcement phenomenon.
(Volley Ball) for Law Enforcement seems silly
(Table Tennis) for Law Enforcement seems silly
But somehow (Jui Jitsu) for Law Enforcement is legit
Not only is it legit, its a million dollar industry. In fact I wasn’t even the USPCA’s first
choice. First they went to a local competition
Jui Jitsu gym. He was going to charge
them $7000 for four hours of training.
Luckily one of the handlers had trained with me before in Special
Operations Control Tactics and suggested the USPCA contact me.
Wait a second Kasey, don’t you teach Taiho Jutsu? Isn’t that just another way of saying Ju
Jutsu for Law Enforcement? Aren’t you
being a hypocritical dick right now?
Ok, yes I teach Ju Jutsu for Law Enforcement, but to best
explain why I’m not being a hypocritical dick I'll use a phrase I have stolen from
Steve Anderson who taught my first Use of Force Instructor Course (and is also
a highly trained martial artist). It
goes something like this;
“I don’t care what your rank is, I don’t care how many
titles you have won, I don’t care how elite your gym is, If you haven’t spilled
coffee down the front of your shirt trying to cuff (I’ll throw in physically
control for the security / bouncer types reading this) someone bigger and
stronger than you (outside of your weight class) fighting you as hard as they
can, then shut the fuck up.”
Here are some things that Operators have to deal with that “combat”
athletes never will deal with that make adding the words for Law Enforcement
seem silly:
- Being kicked while on the ground
- Multiple attackers
- Snow / Ice
- Gravel
- Pavement / Concrete
- Broken glass
All of those things make leisurely staying on your back going
for an arm bar until time runs out and you win on points fairly ridiculous.
Add to that the DDDD’s or (4D’s)
- Drunk
- Drugged
- Deranged (EDP)
- Determined
These are the type of people that Operators have to control. Even if you do get the arm bar these guys won’t
feel the pain for a day or two. Do you
think they are going to tap out and give up?
I’ve encountered 4D’s that have had their calf ripped off by
a K9, and the next day waged a use of force complaint against the officer that
was pinching their leg like a sissy.
This dude had his calf muscle ripped off!!! He didn’t even know a dog was there, and the
next day it only felt like he was being pinched by some weirdo cop!
Do you think they are going to tap out and give up?
OK so let me get off my soap box and back to my point
There is no type of training that can be provided in 4 hours
once a year that can outweigh 4 hours of training every day for multiple
years. You can’t out martial art a
professional martial artist.
So don’t try. That’s the
mindset I set out to change.
This is how I went about it
Introduction
How many of you were raised by
Air Borne Rangers and trained in Jujutsu Aikido and Krav Maga since before you
could walk?
4 hours of training is not going
to make you Jujutsu experts. If you
wanted to be, you would already be one.
You would have found a school and trained on a regular basis for years.
Luckily for us you don’t need to
be a Jujutsu expert. You are cops not
cage fighters. You don’t need to be a
Jujutsu expert, but you do need to be proficient in certain skills on the
ground that allow you to accomplish your job as a Police Officer. One of those skills is accessing your tools
during a physical confrontation. Which,
for you K9 handlers includes the door release that will allow Stanly to come to
the rescue with aggressive rapid dick biting.
I’m not here to sell you on a
style. In fact most of what we will be
doing today is geared on fundamental motions and principles. The training is designed to help you find
what works best for you, so you can apply it under pressure against a resisting
subject under ever changing circumstances that Officers face. I’m not going to show you complicated
techniques, then insist you come to my school for the next 3 years to be able
to do them. Or invite you back to ground
skills 1-a where you learn the good stuff.
My job as Instructor is to make sure that when you walk out of this
class you will be able to prevail in a close quarters confrontation that goes
to the ground.
A little back ground on what we
will be working today -
Today’s training stems back to
the United States Air Force Strategic Air
Command Combative Measures Program implemented just after WWII. That program was further developed for Law
Enforcement by Alaska State Trooper Steven Jimerfield.
Jimerfield’s partner Bruce A.
Heck was killed January 10th, 1997 by a four-time felon who had been out of
jail for only 12 hours after serving a 10-year sentence. Bruce ended up on the ground and was suffocated
in the snow.
Since then strong emphasis has
been placed on ground control, an area where most Law Enforcement Officers need
serious additional training. This
program is not meant to replace what you have, but will enhance and supplement
your program. These techniques will increase your competence in hand to hand
confrontations both standing and on the ground.
With the courts looking at every
contact police officers have with the public, this system has been found to be
non-obtrusive to the public, while at the same time maintaining officer safety
and giving the officer maximum control without causing injury to the suspect or
to the officer. This system has been both court and street proven!
It is our hope that by teaching and sharing the One-On-One Control Tactics
system other officers will not die in the manner that Bruce did in a
hand-to-hand confrontation with a criminal
Discussion
There are three ways encounters
go to the ground
·
Law Enforcement purposefully takes subject to
ground.
·
Law Enforcement and Subject inadvertently fall over
each other as they struggle
·
Subject purposefully takes Law Enforcement Officer
down
It is
important to make the distinction because it will dictate the level of force
you use on the ground.
Law
Enforcement purposefully taking a subject to ground is not “ground fighting”. That is establishing control from the
beginning and maintaining it through cuffing.
That is the goal of any good defensive tactics system.
Many
ground based martial art school advertise that 90% of all fights go to the
ground.
The actual study from the LAPD concluded: “Nearly two thirds of the 1988
altercations (62%) ended with the officer and subject on the ground with the
officer applying a joint lock and handcuffing the subject.” Given this, it
is better put that the LAPD data says when officers physically fought with
suspects (versus simply encountering minor resistance or non-compliance which
required a minor use of force, but did not escalate into an altercation), 95%
of the time those fights took one of five patterns, and 62% of those five types
of altercations ended up with the officer and subject on the ground with the
officer locking and handcuffing the suspect.
After
this report was published, LAPD instituted a program that included training in
ground control skills, which in turn were based on modern judo and jujutsu
grappling skills specially adapted for law enforcement.
Cops
adapting fundamental skills to their trade, not the other way around. 62% ended on the ground not 90% and of that
62% the overwhelming majority of the time the confrontation ended on the ground
was because the Officer chose to take the subject to the ground.
Why do cops take subjects to the
ground?
·
The Earth provides a stable base to control a body
and is always there
·
For control
·
For cuffing
Law
Enforcement and Subject inadvertently fall over each other as they struggle
creates a ground fighting situation.
The level of force needs to be increased quickly so the subject doesn’t
have time to take advantage of a bad situation
Why do criminals take cops to the
ground
·
They are trained fighters stuck in a social
dominance mind set – trying to win
·
To kill them!
A
subject purposefully taking a Law Enforcement Officer down is dangerous! This can range from the roided up, MMA tough
guy who doesn't realize the danger he poses, to a determined criminal that took
you to the ground to kill you
How do you escape arrest by
taking a cop down?
·
Disable or kill them, then run. There is no other explanation why a subject
would purposefully takes Law Enforcement Officer down
No matter how you got there, when
things go to the ground you need to raise your level of force.
Officers have to make a mental
shift away from competition mindset / social dominance games to…
This
ends right NOW!
Flip the switch from arrest and
control to survival
Even if you ended up on the
ground by accident, the longer the confrontation goes on the more time the
subject has to:
·
Get bad ideas
·
Do bad things
·
Go for your gun
You need to raise your level of
force and end the confrontation quickly because going to the ground has
increased the level of danger. Even
if the subject has not increased his
intent to injure you.
If you “wrestle”, if you get
caught up in social dominance games you may actually be accidently encouraging
the subject to wrestle back.
Rams butt heads with other
rams. Social dominance games designed
not to injure.
Humans have social dominance
games designed not to injure hard wired into us too.
Everyone in this room has been
involved in or witnessed some variation of this:
“What you lookin’ at?” barks a
young man, about your size, about your age.
You don’t think you were looking
at anything in particular. You also know the smart thing to do is to give a
little apology and go back to your beer.
But you’re a young man yourself. Before you even realize it, you are
looking dead in his eyes and saying, “Who wants to know?”
“You trying to be smart?”
“What if I am?”
You aren’t sure who stood up
first, but both of you are standing now. His skin is getting red. He’s flexing
his shoulders, looking bigger. You can’t see yourself and you don’t even think
about it, but you are doing the same thing.
More words are exchanged, some
pretty colorful profanities. Both of you step closer and closer. The veins in
his neck and forehead are bulging and his jaw muscles are clenching whenever he
isn’t insulting you.
You throw a quick glance at the
other patrons. Everyone is watching, but no one is doing a thing.
He gets closer—too close—and you
push him away, hard.
He responds with a looping
overhand punch. In a moment you are both a tangle, rolling on the floor and
throwing wild punches until somebody pulls you apart.
No matter how bad ass the style,
all sport applications of martial art are based on these social rules.
(Designed to win status not to injure / maim / kill)
There’s a saying in the martial
arts: “When two tigers fight, one is killed and the other is maimed.”
Actually in nature when two
tigers fight, there’s a dominance display and, if one doesn’t back down, there
is something like a scuffle. Neither is injured. One leaves, the other keeps
the territory.
When a tiger kills prey, that’s a
whole different story. That right there is the difference between a dominance
contest within a species (social violence) and killing for resources (usually
food) outside your species (asocial violence).
When we end up on the ground we
need to stop wrestling and start hunting. Not a fair fight, not a competition, but getting
the job done.
Officers need to switch into a
predator mindset (focused on accomplishing a task) fast. Before the subject has time to get scared and
start doing things that will force you to use even higher levels of force
When we go to the ground we need
to get the job done. Rise to a high
level of force and ease up as control is gained.
Getting the job done is going to
have different definitions depending on the circumstances.
The definition of what “ends”
means is dependent on the level of resistance.
It could mean:
·
Getting up safely and calling fro back up or your
dog to chase him down
·
Transitioning to a taser
·
Burying your muzzle in his arm pit and pulling the
trigger until the threat stops
A win = you and your partners go
home safe, the bad guys go to jail and no one gets sued…successfully
Physical Skills
I’m not going to go over the techniques we practiced. That would be of little benefit in this
format. If you’re interested contact me
and we can set up some hands on training.
But I will give you the premises I operated under. That way you can use these premises to adapt
your own training for practical application.
You can’t out martial art them, but you can out operate
them.
What do Operators have that a MMA guy doesn’t
Taser
Fire arms
Edged Weapons
Partners
Dogs
So ground skills have to incorporate using these advantages
Ground skills must use simple motions that Officers already
know or that are instinctive to all human beings.
These motions must utilize gross motor skills that are
available to Officers when the are adrenalized or under extreme weather
conditions
Grounds skills must be principle based so that Officers can
improvise under the ever changing conditions of actual confrontation.
Ground skills must end the confrontation is three motions or
less.
So, as I mentioned earlier the class went very well and the
feedback was fantastic. All the Officers
worked very hard and I think a lot of progress was made.
I was very happy with the class and look foreward to
training with this group again.
Train hard, Train smart, Be safe