Sunday, March 24, 2013

The 4 / 5 split: Control Tactics / Police Combatives


Recently I put on an edged weapons defense class, and then Control Tactics / Police Combatives and Firearms training for some recently hired Police Officers.

Some core concepts were touched in all of these classes which got me thinking.  And generally when I get thinking I write about it here.

Wrote a blog about it, wanna read it?, here it go…

The 4 / 5 split

Before we get into the “meat” (pun fully intended) of this concept, I want to touch on predatory mindset again.

The word predator has a very negative connotation to many, but predatory skills are just tools.  Like any tools they can be used to good or ill.

Its is very difficult to switch from customer service “officer friendly” mode to lethal force close quarters combat mode in time to do anything useful.

It is much easier to start with the assumption force is necessary and it’s use imminent, then down shift into officer friendly if / when it isn't. 

Not only assuming that force will be necessary but actively stacking the deck to be able to use force efficiently. 

This naturally elevates your level of awareness, and sends off subconscious “not to be fucked with vibes”. 

However, those same vibes can also spook the shit out of some people. They might not know why but they may feel the need to fight.  Turning a maybe person into a no person.

So, this is where a professional uses other predator strategies - charm tactics.

The predator will use social skills to get the victim into a vulnerable position
A predator who is skilled at using charm tactics will set it up so that every step into his trap is one that the victim not only chose but that she believes that she initiated

"Good Guys" can use these same skill sets

Stacking the deck to be able to use force efficiently while saying the things “officer friendly” needs to say. 

Using what “officer friendly” has to say (Split attention tasks) to get into an advantageous position.

Sending the don’t fuck with me vibe without scaring them into fight or flight, and being pleasantly surprised when you don’t have to kill or maim anyone.

I like to think of this process as hunting.  However, even though you are using predator strategies, when you are hunting you are only justified to use lower levels of force (1-4).  This is more akin to live trapping for a zoo or scientific research.  You don’t want to kill the prey you are hunting.  You want to take control of it (unharmed ideally) and bring it to where it can be contained.

I don't like the term "defensive tactics".  I feel if you are on defense you are already loosing.  I prefer Control Tactics.  I am on offense, not to hurt the subject, but to take control of him / her and bring the subject to where he/she can be contained.(unharmed ideally)

To help clarify here is a sample use of force continuum again.
1.       Presence
Awareness
Presentation (do you look like a slob or do you have your shit together?)
Physical Fitness

2.       Verbal commands
Communication Skills
De-escalation
3.       Contact Controls
Touching or Seizing the offender
Escort Compliance
Standing Controls
Pain Compliance
Joint Locks
4.       Compliance Techniques
“Soft Hands”
Take Downs
Throws
Pins       

These are the skill sets used to control a subject.  This is the amount of force you are justified using:
(a) In effecting a lawful arrest; or
(b) In the execution of legal process; or
(c) In enforcing an order of the court; or
(d) In executing any other duty imposed upon the public officer by law

When you are hunting (live trapping), these are the tactics you are setting up.  Whatever physical skills you use, they have to work against someone actively fighting against you.  If you have them controlled (immobilized) before they have time to resist it makes the task much easier.


Humans are social creatures and have subconscious rules for social violence.  

We are also hunters and capable of killing prey.  

We are fairly unique in that we can use the tools and tactics that we developed to hunt prey to kill other humans.

It’s one thing to hunt prey; it’s another thing entirely to hunt another predator (big game hunting).
Use a level 4 technique in a level 5 situation and you will get damaged
This is why there is a hard split between level 4 and level 5


Level 5 and up is what I call Police Combatives.  Examples from a use of force continuum include:

5.       Disabling Techniques
“Hard Hands”
Impact Techniques
Striking / Kicking
6.       Potentially Lethal Force
3 – 5 – 7
Lateral vascular neck restraints
Cervical subluxation
Weapons Techniques

These are the skill sets used to render a subject incapable of injuring you any further.
This is for when the subject is not fighting against being controlled but actively trying to damage you.

Trying to control someone that is attempting to damage you will get you injured (maybe fatally so).

So you will need solid “disabling techniques”

As I stated earlier, its is very difficult to switch from customer service “officer friendly” mode to lethal force close quarters combat mode in time to do anything useful.  

If you were hunting “big game” (another predator) you shouldn't be surprised that they attacked.  However, if you got “jumped” you need to turn things around quickly before you take too much damage to do anything. 

Counter ambush.
Not blocking, not evading, but turning the tide.  The Japanese sometimes call this Sen No Sen or attacking the attack.  

You are not defending but actively counter attacking.  That critical ¼ second before the effects of adrenalin start to kick in.  Not defensive tactics, not even control tactics anymore, but combative measures to end the threat's capability to harm you. No matter what the style, you need to find something that works for you.  Something that protects you and allows you to deliver force (damage) into the attacker at the same time.  All while improving your position so the attacker can no longer damage you.  Once you find this you have to drill this into a conditioned response (speed of nerve).

Follow Through 
After your counter ambush action you have to do what it takes to stop the attacker.  What ever it is that you do, it has to stop / shut down someone trying to hurt you.

Whatever it takes
You are no longer trying to control the attacker but to disable him so he can no longer attack you.  A very clear and very important distinction.


This is where the level 5 and higher techniques come into play. 

When level 5 is justified use high end levels of force.  You can’t allow your self to fall into “fighter” thinking– can I take him?  You must think {react} like a hunter – what is the best way to take him?

{Actually when you are in a position where level 5 techniques are justified / necessary you will be highly adrenalized and won’t be doing much thinking at all.  At this point you will be reacting.  Your thinking is done in training.  So make sure you receive quality training before you find yourself in this situation.  You don’t rise to the occasion you drop to your level of training…in an adrenalized body.} 

No matter how big and bad they are, they are just 7 pints of blood in a skin sack, their spinal column is only protected by thin rings of fragile bone, and most things in the environment are stronger than their skull including the planet.

You can not rely on pain to get the job done.  You must disable the attackers ability to do you harm!

A case in point from recent training, a female Officer asked me about using pressure points to control someone on the ground.  So glutton for punishment that I am I volunteered for her to experiment on.  She worked the pressure points she was taught, and she did them well it hurt.  But it in no way stopped me from continuing to do what ever I wanted to do.  Drunk, drugged, demented, or like I was just plain determined any of those D4 can fight through pain.

If it wouldn't work on a predator in nature don’t rely on it to work on a human predator (big game).  Would you  try to pressure point a mountain lion?


I have a distinct problem with self defense in general but especially women’s self defense that focuses on delivering pain.  You see the instructor (usually a man teaching women) having the women deliver ineffectual strikes to pads, or to a guy dressed up in a red man/spartan/spear gear/whatever suit.  

Or scratching his eyes and biting his ears in the “shredder” fashion.   All the while shouting encouragement and talking about empowerment.


I prefer this Shredder  

Putting all the blood born pathogen stuff aside, and looking at it solely from a tactical stand point this shows a distinct lack of field experience to me.  

Don’t get me wrong do what ever it takes to get out of a bad situation but don't rely on pain alone.  Understand, hurting them at best will only slow them down, and is likely to just piss them off.  

Pain may stop an attack in the dojo.  Especially if having the student feel good about themselves and sign up for more lessons is a priority for the instructor.   Pain might even stop an attack on the street if it is used to direct or "steer" the assailant into a disabling technique.  However, pain alone does not stop the drunk, drugged, demented, or just plain determined.  Who the fuck do you think is going to attack women?  Disabling them also hurts them, but it also dis-fucking-ables them!  Meaning they are no longer capable of hurting you!

If it wouldn't work on a predator in nature don’t rely on it to work on a human predator (big game).  Would you try to bite a mountain lion’s ear, or scratch his eyes?

Another way to think about it

Zombies are popular in media.  Zombies are predators.  No one fights a zombie.  You don’t punch a zombie in the gut.  You don’t deliver 17 Krav knees to its zombie nuts.  You render a zombie incapable of hurting you. 

How is that done?
  • Breaking long bones
  • Brain trauma
    • Impact
    • Lack of blood
    • Lack of oxygen
    • Severed spinal column

If the subject is trying to hurt you, you must render him / her incapable of doing so. 
If you are incapable of stopping a zombie, how will you stop a human predator?

It is as simple and more efficient than any scratch bite or kick.  Remember no matter how big and bad they are, they are just 7 pints of blood in a skin sack, their spinal column is only protected by thin rings of fragile bone, and most things in the environment are stronger than their skull including the planet.



Knowing when to stop
This is not cart blanch to start maiming folks.  Use a level 5 in a level 4 situation and you will get sued.
Force has to be scaled as conditions change.
What does that mean?  Totality of the circumstances.

Factors and circumstances.  Except for gender these work both ways, meaning when they are in your favor force can be decreased, when they are not force must be increased.

Circumstances
Inability to disengage 
• Proximity to weapon
• Injury or exhaustion
• Hazardous environment
• Special knowledge (
• Surprise
• Ground level

Operator / Subject Factors
• Skill
• Size
• Strength
• Numbers
• Mental state
• Gender
• Sometimes age
• Physical or mental disability

As control is gained force is lowered.  When they can no longer hurt you the use of force stops. 
For cops this means they are in cuffs or for civilians when you can disengage and get to safety.

Amateurs and assholes continue to cause damage after the opponent is no longer a threat because they cannot control their emotions.

Professionals do not strike a downed opponent because they “might” get back up.  
Professionals make sure the opponent can no longer hurt them, then get cuffs on them or get to safety.

Don't be an asshole be professional.  Don't try to hurt someone who is attacking you.  Disable their ability to attack you

Train hard, Train smart, Be safe



Monday, March 11, 2013

Swinging big wood



The Chinese use the same word for challenge and opportunity.  Well, that is not actually true but it’s one of those things that is said over and over so often that everyone thinks it’s true.

The challenge I faced recently is that the department is short three Patrol Officers.  Kind of like every Marine is a Rifleman, every Officer is a Patrolman (or woman).  So I am back on patrol for a few months.  No big deal I always kind of liked patrol.  The challenge was making sure I still got all of my training in.  That challenge also created some new training opportunities.

Before we get to the new stuff lets review where I am coming from.  If you will recall the super soldier project, which trans-morphed into Batman by 40.  One of the requisites was training I can do in the morning before work, that increases cardio vascular stamina, works specifics combative skill sets, and doesn't lead to over training when combined with strength training and running.

For strength training I like to do a whole body suspension body weight circuit along with skill specific training.  Looks something like this:
Saturday – Strength & Fundamental Motions Tabata
Monday – Strength & Nage Waza (Throwing Techniques)
Wednesday – Strength and Kansetsu Waza (Joint Locks)

I also run three times a week
Friday – Distance
Sunday – Sprints and Plyometrics
Tuesday – Interval training 

My usual schedule is Monday through Thursday 0630 – 1630.  Thursdays are almost always tactical training days so I made that my rest day (sometimes a not so much rest day depending on the training).  So that meant I needed three (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday) A.M. training workouts.

Monday – Atemi Waza (Striking) A heavy bag and jump rope circuit
Tuesday – Fundamental Motions Plyometrics.  Tabata training explosive fundamental motions against the resistance of plyobands.  A longer more intense version of what I do after strength training on Saturdays
Wednesday – Kenjutsu

Even Fridays I got extra training combining elements of Wednesday and Monday.

With the new schedule I work Saturday, Sunday, Monday every other week and on Fridays the opposite week.

So I needed some new A.M. workouts

I didn't want to just recycle the workouts I already do to prevent boredom and repetitive use over training.  So, I needed to develop training that fit my Batman by 40 criteria, and covered other aspects of combatives

Physical Skills Platform (Aspects of Combatives)
A use of force continuum is an example of rules of engagement found in most Law Enforcement agencies’ use of force policies.
Here is an example of a use of force continuum
1.       Presence
Physical Fitness
Awareness* situational awareness program
2.       Verbal commands
De-escalation
Communication Skills
3.       Contact Controls
Touching or Seizing the offender
Escort Compliance
Standing Controls
Pain Compliance
Joint Locks
4.       Compliance Techniques
“Soft Hands”
Take Downs
Throws
Pins       
5.       Disabling Techniques
“Hard Hands”
Impact Techniques
Striking / Kicking
6.       Potentially Lethal Force
3 – 5 – 7
Weapons Techniques

If you are going to employ your martial arts skills in the professional use of force you must assure that your own personal style covers all these aspects.

All Operators have to have skill sets at all levels of force.  I like to use this model as a frame work for operators to develop their own operational style.

Most of that is covered with my current training except for Pins (Osae Komi) and weapon techniques.

So I combined elements of the offensive ground work class I teach and transitions into different shooting positions into a workout.

But that’s not what this blog is about.  Maybe the details of that training and what I’ve learned from it will be the topic for a different day.

The title of the blog is swinging big wood.  Sexual innuendo aside what I’m talking about is Suburi.

Specifically how to get a good work out that improves skills applicable to 21st century combatives from swing a big sword around.


Suburi is a Japanese word for practice swings.  Outside of Japan, the word is used exclusively for repetitive individual cutting exercises used in Japanese martial arts such as kendo, aikido, iaidō, and kenjutsu.

I like Suburi but I needed to switch it up from practice swings to incorporate more fundamental motions.

I have been very fortunate with the Kenjutsu training I received in that it tied directly back to the principles of what made empty hand techniques work.  Now, if I can find the sword in the motion then I know the technique no matter what the style.

Most combatives can be traced back one way or another to Jujutsu.  Jujutsu can be traced back to the noto techniques of Kenjutsu.  So it stands to reason that the fundamentals of the foundation would be universal to anything that came from it.

I train fundamental motions so often because they apply to all aspects of combatives.
If you boil it down there really only so many ways to move in relation to another person

Lateral             (Yoko Sabaki)
Circular           (Tenkan)
Opening          (Hiraki)
Entering           (Irimi)
Direct Entry    (Shomen Irimi)
To the rear       (Ura)

No matter what the weapon, no matter what the art, no matter what combative aspect within that art in fits within one of those six general motions.

Cops don’t want to learn a bunch of Japanese terms so when Jimerfield Sensei teaches cops he assigns numbers to the motions.
Lateral             (Yoko Sabaki)             1 & 2
Circular           (Tenkan)                      3 & 4
Opening          (Hiraki)                        5 & 6

He took that from his training in Nihon Jujutsu.

That is cool but it didn't explain other motions that have worked for me.  So in the training I provide I added
Entering           (Irimi)                         7 & 8
Direct Entry    (Shomen Irimi)            9 & 10
To the rear       (Ura)                            0

There is a saying in Judo – When pushed, pull – when pulled, push.  Similarly in Aikido the saying goes when pushed open when pulled enter.

These ideas / motions complement or cancel each other.

Push / Enter                                         Pull / Open
Circular (Tenkan)                                Opening (Hiraki)                    
Entering (Irimi)                                   Lateral  (Yoko Sabaki)
Direct Entry (Shomen Irimi)               To the rear (Ura)

What makes fundamental motions so cool is that they are universally applicable
Those motions are also what makes Kenjutsu work.  

Ok, ok, you may be asking how does this apply to suburi specifically and working out in general?

Suburi training usually consists of standing still and doing a few cuts.  Not great for drilling specific useful motions, more just a warm up or a work out for arms and shoulders.

However, if you use the complimentary motion principle and work opposing motions together you get all the benifits of regular suburi training, plus fundamental motions training, plus good cardio vascular effect because you are constntly moving.

The next part might get a little inside baseball but bear with me take the principles and apply them to any weapons training that you may do.

The Suburi I do now looks like this

OFFENSE                                                      DEFENSE     
7          8          Entering                                  2          1          Lateral Motion
YOKO GIRI / NUKEDOMEN                     KUBURI SHINOGI 

3          4          Circular                                   6          5          Opening
SUIHEI                                                          UCHI OTOSHI SHINOGI   

9          10        Direct Entry                            0          -1         Enemy to the rear
SHOMEN UCHI                                            URA TSUKI 

2          1          Lateral Motion                        7          8          Entering
YOKOMEN UCHI VARIATION                SUMI SHINOGI       

6          5          Opening                                  3          4          Circular
YOKOMEN UCHI                                        HASSO GAMAE      

9          10        Direct Entry                            0          -1         Enemy to the rear
TSUKI                                                           HILT STRIKE           
                                   
ONE MINUTE PER SIDE (left and right) REPEAT X2 = 24 MINUTES              

{Side Note - when you add the number assigned to the motion to it's complimentary motion it always adds up to 9.}  

Now you may ask is this a coincidence?  Isn't 9 sacred to the Ninja?  Kasey are you a Ninja?

Of course not there is no historical proof that Ninja ever even existed, much less still operate today.  But isn't that exactly what a Ninja would say? 

Ok back to the point of the blog...


This motion training not only helps with fitness and Kenjutsu but has positive crossover training effects to empty hand combatives, and firearms skills

It takes about 24 minutes, it's fun, and it kicked my ass.

When you work the complimentary motions together (9) it creates a flow that reminded of Indian Club training.

For those you unfamiliar with club training I paraphrased the following information from
http://www.oldtimestrongman.com/products/classic-wooden-indian-clubs

Every workout, there you are, pushing and pulling heavy weights (which is definitely a good thing), but there's more to it than strengthening the muscles alone... You must maintain stronger joints as well. 

After all, when you lift weights, you can only lift them in straight lines...but your body moves and functions in a circular manner.  This is especially true for the ball-and-socket joint of the shoulder. Think of how many different directions you can move your arm and how few of them you can reach with "weights" alone.

There's no question that the shoulder girdle is by far one of the most movable areas of the body but it is also one of the most fragile. Regardless of how you use your body, it is very important to keep the shoulders strong, loose, and flexible. 

But many people never fully develop their natural shoulder girdle mobility and muscular balance. Let me tell you about a simple training technique that will help..

                                               


Several thousand years ago, Indian wrestlers and warriors prepared themselves for battle by swinging wooden "clubs" to condition their bodies and build upper-body strength. This practice spread amongst many different countries throughout the ensuing centuries - club swinging of various forms can be found in just about every middle-eastern and Asian country.

In the 1800's, British soldiers started practicing "Indian Club" techniques and brought them back to Europe where the clubs became part of the physical culture tradition. 

In time, European immigrants brought Indian Club training to American shores. Club swinging was adopted into American school physical education programs and military physical readiness training. 

In the early 20th century, many students began their day with a few minutes of club swinging to wake up mind and body. 

Utilizing a series of graceful swinging movements, Indian Club training was a simple method for individuals to build stronger, healthier bodies while promoting joint integrity and improving strength and overall vitality. 

You simply need a space big enough to let you swing the clubs with out interference and you are in business.  Keep in mind that just because the clubs are "relatively" light doesn't mean that you aren't going to get one hell of a workout. 

When used correctly the clubs can humble even the strongest of athletes
(As I mentioned this type of training kicked my ass, and I of course am awesome)







This is what Indian Clubs look like. They range from one to three pounds in weight and from 16-1/2 inches to 20 inches in length.


This is what a suburito looks like.  


A suburitō is commonly around 115 cm (45 in) in length, with a mass of 1 kg (2.2 lb). However, these bokuto (wooden swords) can vary widely in size and weight.

Look at this maniac swinging around a railroad tie




So bottom line - Work out.  But don't just work out, use your brains.  Find training that not only makes you more fit, but also makes you a more skilled combatant.

Physicality has it's limits, but you can always become more efficient and smarter.

Train hard, Train smart, Be safe


Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Do know harm


This was a patch from one of the tactical medics I trained this week

Cool week at work. My entire 40 hour work week consisted of tactical training.  Shooting, close quarters combat, room clearing, and combatives.  Fun, very "modern samurai".  Wake up, work out, tactical training, sleep. One night we even went out for sushi.

We started this week of training with a review of department policy and state use of force laws.

We are at the tip of the spear, the high end of the use of force continuum.  SWAT Operators (all professionals) have to know
How to use force
When / Why force is justified
How to scale force (ever changing as circumstances dictate)
Articulate the force used

So as you can imagine I haven't had much spare time lately.
In fact as I am writing this I am on my way to Mankato for a high end use of force seminar for Law Enforcement and civilian martial artists.  I was prepping my notes on assessment, scaling force, and articulation when I took a break to check into facebook.

Every time I did that this week, I came across the sentiment that knowledge of use of force law is for pussies.

As of late facebook has become more of a pain than fun.  As I am training professionals in the aforementioned fields of study I am inundated with armatures spewing their fantasies of how force should be used with blatant disregard for the law or reality.

Strike first, strike hard, strike fast, no mercy!



Pretty much the opposite of what I am teaching professionals who are actually going to face dangerous situations and use high levels of force on violent criminals.

Here are some examples of what I mean






So my busy week of tactical training and a couple of social media posts all kind of came together to inspire this blog.


Perfect pre-emptive self defense strike
You saw the video, here are some of the responses to it

"6 feet rule, any one crosses it I drop them."

Really tough guy, you pre-emptivly attack anyone that gets within 6 feet of you?
So if you ever walk down a busy street, eat in a crowded restaurant, watch a movie, go to a football game etc. you are just dropping people left and right?

Not likely

Big dogs don't bark
What do I mean by that?

People who have experience with more than just play ground /  high school fight type social violence rarely make statements like that.

More importantly professionals avoid violence.  They understand that any time things go physical, there is a potential for things to go lethal.  So anything not worth killing or dying for is avoided.

Professionals don't go physical unless they have to.

Look at the video, anything there worth killing / dying for?
Just a social violence pissing match between two macho assholes.

However, when I suggest the whole situation could be solved by walking away, I’m told it’s that sentiment that has ruined America

Bottom line is, even though I use force professionally it doesn’t matter what I think self defense is.  It doesn’t matter what Internet tough guys think self defense is.  Self defense is a legal term, what matters is what the law says self defense is.



I am the law


Strong arm of the law

You are expected and required to use the minimum level of force that you reasonably believe will safely resolve the situation.

That small sentence can be the difference between going home and trying to avoid ass rape in county lock up, and every word in that sentence is loaded so let's break it down.

Expected and required

Duty to Act (Law Enforcement) - Preclusion (Civilian)
Cops have a responsibility to control / stop violent incidents. Civilians are expected to leave violent situations if they can

Force
To make someone do what they do not wish or stop them from doing what they do wish

Levels
Generally ranked by level of intrusion. 
Presence, for instance influences the Threat to modify his or her own behavior. 
Verbal might hurt feelings. 
Pain is more intrusive than hurt feelings
Injury is more intrusive than pain. 
Deadly force is the most intrusive of all.

Minimum
Minimum is the least intrusive

Reasonable belief
Totality of circumstances
As known to the officer at the time

Safely

You are not to turn it into a contest, but to win, safely. 
You have a responsibility to the citizens to stay healthy enough to do your job. 
No stupid chances
No “fair” fights

Re solve
End it, prevent the subject from further violence

Situation
Must be a legal use of force

In order for the situation to be a legal use of force you (or another) must reasonably believe you are at immediate risk of death or great bodily harm.

In order to be an immediate threat, an individual must display (and the officer must be able to clearly articulate how he knew) three things:
Intent
Means
Opportunity
Preclusion (civilians)

Intent is the desire to do something bad, e.g. harm the officer, self or a third party; break a law; or refuse to comply with a lawful order.
We are very good at reading intent but many officers are very poor at articulating intent. 

Means
The threat must have the ability to carry out intent.
 A person threatening to shoot you must have a gun to be an immediate threat, for instance.


Opportunity
The threat must be able to reach you with the means.

In the officer’s arsenal, handcuffs are intended to limit or eliminate means; jails limit or eliminate opportunity.


Preclusion
If you do not have a duty to act, ask yourself:
Do I need to engage?
More often than not (unless you are protecting a 3rd party) if you have time to ask yourself that, then the answer is no.

If you do not, then you better be already engaging.

So,  let's take a look at the "perfect preemptive strike self defense video again.
Both parties show intent, they both have opportunity and means as well.

Here is where people need to be trained to look past macho bullshit.
Both of these guys could have left at any time.   Why did sucker punch need to engage?

But what if I try to leave and he follows me?

Then you have preclusion, then you have a legitimate claim of self defense.

That is where tough guy's 6 foot rule would actually make sense.   Confrontation, one guy leaves, the other guy follows,  if that guy tries to close distance, then striking him is justified. It's not preemptive, his attack began when he followed, and attempted to close distance.

So the 6 foot rule is a good tactic. However, tough guy's instructor (or whatever source he took that tactic from) failed to show when, where, how to use it legitimately.


Which brings me to - Sensei giri
The obligation of the teacher. If you are teaching self defense you owe it to your students to know and be able to teach force law as well.  Students, if you are being trained in self defense you better be damn sure your instructor knows what the fuck he is talking about.

How would you explain the force you used if you had to write it in a report?
How would you explain the force you used to the first responding officer?

Here is an example of what I mean.  A portion of Saturday's class (from lesson plan)
NE WAZA (GROUND TECHNIQUES)
OFFENSE

Over all Learning Goal
Students will show proficiency controlling aggressive subjects on the ground and mitigating their ability to continue fighting.

Specific Training Objectives
Students will demonstrate an understanding of the underlying principles of:
• Hold Downs
• Vascular restraints
• Joint locks

Students will be able to assess if ground work is the best tactical option for the circumstance.
Students will demonstrate knowledge of use of force law
Students will be able to scale force as appropriate and articulate the justification for the level of force they used to resolve a conflict


Saturday's class was heavy on the deep end of the use of force spectrum. You can’t give students the physical skills unless you teach assessment and force scaling to go with them.

The amount of force needed to safely control a situation is ever changing from moment to moment as the circumstances change.
Therefore the amount of force justified is also on a sliding scale.
The more control you have the less force is justified.  The less control you have the more force is justified to gain control.

How can you scale force if you don’t know what force is justified?  How do you know when to stop?

Professionals stop a subject’s ability to continue fighting.
Amateurs strike a downed opponent because they can’t control their emotions.
How much more so if their instructor has ingrained finishing blows through training?

Ending an attacker’s ability to continue fighting is legitimate.  But people must be trained how to assess if that is necessary.

The attitudes reflected in social media are a direct result of this lack of knowledge / training. If all you train is physical skills, physical skills will be your only option.  Every thing looks like a nail when all you have is a hammer.  Physical skills should be your last line of defense. Obviously you need skill in that area. But the attacker should have to work through several other layers of defense before you get there

Multiple layers

Let me use another post I saw on social media to set up different layers of defense.  The post (survey) asked when / where you are most likely to use self defense.

One reply was, “when I’m walking home drunk from the bar at 0300”

WTF?

Better to avoid than run, better to run than to de-escalate, better to de-escalate than fight, better to fight than to die.

Avoidance the 1st line of defense.
Bad things happen in predictable places.  If you avoid the places you can avoid a huge percentage of the violence in the world.

n       Bars – Parties – Anywhere people get their minds altered
n       Private places
n       Anywhere that young men gather
n       Where territories are in dispute
n       Anywhere with limited mobility or escape routes

Kasey, are you saying I don’t have a right to go have a good time?  No, go pursue your happiness.  However, If you have to / choose to be at a place where there is a predictably higher risk of violence, you need to operate at a higher level of awareness.

So instead of walking dark alleys late at night while you are drunk, try getting a cab and be delivered safely to your door.  Granted I can’t charge you $800 for a killer self defense what to do if…seminar if you use that free advice, but it has a higher chance of being successful than purposefully putting yourself in a shitty situation and hoping your kung fu is strong enough to get you out of it.

Escape and Evade the 2nd line of defense
Ambushes work best when:
n       When the victim can be distracted

n       When mobility is limited

n       When the threat can safely get close enough.

n       When escape routes are limited

I can’t give you a list of things to look for.  If you look for every thing you won’t see anything.

Instead of looking at every place where you could be attacked, look at places you could use to set up an attack if you were a predator.

-On your daily route where would you wait to mug yourself? 
•If you were a process predator (enjoy the act) where would you set up to make a quick snatch? 
•How would you break into your own home?   
•Where would you come into your office on a shooting spree?

If something odd is happening at one of those places – RUN!
ALWAYS run
n       TOWARD SAFETY

n       NOT just away from danger

What does that mean?
n       Where are the exits
n       How could I get out of this place?

n       Have an escape plan / exit strategy

De-escalation the 3rd line of defense
If you don’t ever practice it you are not giving your students permission to do it.  Whether purposefully or not you are conditioning your students to ignore anything but fighting as a solution.

Fight
Martial Arts vs. Social Violence
n       This is the type of violence most young men experience
•        Unfortunately many instructors then extrapolate that all violence can be dealt with by what works for social violence
n       This type is the easiest to avoid
n       This type of violence is a crime for both parties

Do I need to engage?
If you don’t have time to ask the question you better be engaging

•        Operant Conditioning

•        Counter Assault
n       Finding your core concept

Operant Conditioning
n       Stimulus
•        A surprise attack
n       Response
•        A technique or core concept that:
n       Improves your position
n       Worsens their position
n       Protects you from damage
n       Allows you to damage them


It feels like maybe I have written this blog 100 times before.  That’s fine maybe someone else will start thinking about self defense differently because they read this one.  Every time I write it the concepts become clearer for me too, so it becomes a form of self training. 

The folks that need a different perspective are the ones most substantially invested (financially, identity, or both) in physical skills training only, especially to resolve simple social violence situations.

These people mask their ignorance in flawed information / marketing being passed off as knowledge.

Examples include but are not limited to:
"There are no rules in a fight"
"I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6"
"90% of all fights go to the ground"
"We don't train for social violence"
"The stick is an average weapon"
"Flinch response"
Ultimate/guaranteed/combatives
"MMA is the closest you can get to streetfighting"
Streetfighting
Reality Based Self-Defense
"In a real fight..."

So if you are training for self defense make sure your trainer knows what he/she is talking about, and not hiding behind cliches.  Make sure they do KNOW harm, and that they do no harm to you by giving you no, or blatantly wrong information on the actual use of force.  Bottom line, it is you who is going to have to live with the decisions you make and their consequences not your Sensei.

Ok, Ok rant over.  I should really quit my bitching.  I had a great week and it was wrapped up in a very cool seminar.  I got to teach with my Judo Sensei and my Karate Sensei, and I feel I got a lot of good information out to some good people.



Train hard, Train SMART , Be safe